Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC upheld the conviction under Section 138 of the NI Act for dishonour of a cheque due to insufficient funds. The accused did not dispute the signature but claimed the cheque was security for a loan; however, the court held the presumption of discharge of legal liability stood unrebutted. The accused, as principal debtor, was liable, and action against the guarantor was unnecessary. The complainant proved issuance, dishonour, notice, and non-payment beyond reasonable doubt. The sentence of three months' imprisonment and Rs. 20,000/- compensation on a principal amount of Rs. 60,000/- was deemed appropriate and not excessive. The revision petition was dismissed, affirming the trial court's findings and sentencing.
The HC upheld the conviction under Section 138 of the NI Act for dishonour of a cheque due to insufficient funds. The accused did not dispute the signature but claimed the cheque was security for a loan; however, the court held the presumption of discharge of legal liability stood unrebutted. The accused, as principal debtor, was liable, and action against the guarantor was unnecessary. The complainant proved issuance, dishonour, notice, and non-payment beyond reasonable doubt. The sentence of three months' imprisonment and Rs. 20,000/- compensation on a principal amount of Rs. 60,000/- was deemed appropriate and not excessive. The revision petition was dismissed, affirming the trial court's findings and sentencing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
