Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT set aside the disallowance under section 40A(3) r.w.r 6DD relating to payments made via bearer cheques, holding that the assessee demonstrated the genuineness of payments to laborers, and the AO failed to produce evidence of bogus transactions or non-payment. Consequently, the disallowance by the AO was deleted. Regarding the disallowance of interest expenses treated as attributable to bogus cash credits, the Tribunal partially upheld the CIT(A)'s findings but noted discrepancies concerning interest claimed for certain parties without corresponding loans. The matter was remanded to the AO for further factual verification on these points. Thus, the appeal was partly allowed with directions for reassessment of interest disallowance.
The ITAT set aside the disallowance under section 40A(3) r.w.r 6DD relating to payments made via bearer cheques, holding that the assessee demonstrated the genuineness of payments to laborers, and the AO failed to produce evidence of bogus transactions or non-payment. Consequently, the disallowance by the AO was deleted. Regarding the disallowance of interest expenses treated as attributable to bogus cash credits, the Tribunal partially upheld the CIT(A)'s findings but noted discrepancies concerning interest claimed for certain parties without corresponding loans. The matter was remanded to the AO for further factual verification on these points. Thus, the appeal was partly allowed with directions for reassessment of interest disallowance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
