Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that denial of the deduction claimed under section 80IBA solely due to belated filing of the income tax return by 16 days was unjustified. The tribunal found that the assessee had a reasonable and bona fide cause for delay, attributable to the Covid-19 pandemic, and had made substantial compliance. The addition was made without issuing any show cause notice, violating principles of natural justice. The deduction was admissible on the facts, and the specific amount was computed accordingly. The tribunal emphasized that technical non-compliance should not result in denial of substantive rights, and the assessee should not be burdened with taxes not legally payable. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, affirming the entitlement to the claimed deduction despite the delayed filing.
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that denial of the deduction claimed under section 80IBA solely due to belated filing of the income tax return by 16 days was unjustified. The tribunal found that the assessee had a reasonable and bona fide cause for delay, attributable to the Covid-19 pandemic, and had made substantial compliance. The addition was made without issuing any show cause notice, violating principles of natural justice. The deduction was admissible on the facts, and the specific amount was computed accordingly. The tribunal emphasized that technical non-compliance should not result in denial of substantive rights, and the assessee should not be burdened with taxes not legally payable. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, affirming the entitlement to the claimed deduction despite the delayed filing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.