Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that the denial of deduction under section 54 was unjustified. Despite the absence of possession and registration of the property due to a Supreme Court-imposed legal impediment, the assessee had entered into a valid agreement and made substantial payment prior to filing the return. The Tribunal applied a purposive interpretation of section 54 read with section 2(47), recognizing "purchase" in a broader sense to uphold the exemption from long-term capital gains tax. It distinguished prior precedents related to the Transfer of Property Act, emphasizing that the intention of the legislature is to avoid taxing capital gains where the consideration is invested in property acquisition, even if formal transfer is delayed by circumstances beyond the assessee's control. Consequently, the assessee was entitled to claim deduction under section 54.
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that the denial of deduction under section 54 was unjustified. Despite the absence of possession and registration of the property due to a Supreme Court-imposed legal impediment, the assessee had entered into a valid agreement and made substantial payment prior to filing the return. The Tribunal applied a purposive interpretation of section 54 read with section 2(47), recognizing "purchase" in a broader sense to uphold the exemption from long-term capital gains tax. It distinguished prior precedents related to the Transfer of Property Act, emphasizing that the intention of the legislature is to avoid taxing capital gains where the consideration is invested in property acquisition, even if formal transfer is delayed by circumstances beyond the assessee's control. Consequently, the assessee was entitled to claim deduction under section 54.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.