PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
The AT upheld the determination that the transactions involving demonetized currency deposits and subsequent transfers constituted benami transactions under Section 2(9) of PBPTA. The Initiating Officer and the Ld. AA provided cogent reasons to believe the arrangements were benami, which the appellant's reliance on contrary judgments failed to undermine. No appeal was filed by the benamidar against the impugned order. Consequently, the property was affirmed as benami, with M/s Shivam Enterprises recognized as the beneficial owner and Sh. AKK as the benamidar. The appeal was dismissed in its entirety.
The AT upheld the determination that the transactions involving demonetized currency deposits and subsequent transfers constituted benami transactions under Section 2(9) of PBPTA. The Initiating Officer and the Ld. AA provided cogent reasons to believe the arrangements were benami, which the appellant's reliance on contrary judgments failed to undermine. No appeal was filed by the benamidar against the impugned order. Consequently, the property was affirmed as benami, with M/s Shivam Enterprises recognized as the beneficial owner and Sh. AKK as the benamidar. The appeal was dismissed in its entirety.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
