Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC allowed the revenue's appeal, setting aside the tribunal's order that had permitted cancellation of the self-assessed bill of entry for home consumption. It was held that under the Customs Act, once assessment under Section 68(b) is complete, the importer must pay duty and interest if goods remain beyond 90 days in the warehouse, and there is no provision for withdrawal or cancellation of the bill of entry except where title to goods is relinquished. The Court found the tribunal erred in not considering whether the proper officer could act on the cancellation request dated 08.10.2021 and misapplied relevant legal principles, including Section 46(5). The ruling affirmed that the request for cancellation was not maintainable, and the importer is obligated to clear goods on payment of duty and interest. Substantial questions of law were answered in favor of the revenue.
The HC allowed the revenue's appeal, setting aside the tribunal's order that had permitted cancellation of the self-assessed bill of entry for home consumption. It was held that under the Customs Act, once assessment under Section 68(b) is complete, the importer must pay duty and interest if goods remain beyond 90 days in the warehouse, and there is no provision for withdrawal or cancellation of the bill of entry except where title to goods is relinquished. The Court found the tribunal erred in not considering whether the proper officer could act on the cancellation request dated 08.10.2021 and misapplied relevant legal principles, including Section 46(5). The ruling affirmed that the request for cancellation was not maintainable, and the importer is obligated to clear goods on payment of duty and interest. Substantial questions of law were answered in favor of the revenue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
