Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
The CESTAT held that Rule 6(b)(ii) of the Valuation Rules does not apply to imported raw materials used as inputs that were not manufactured by either unit and merely routed through an intermediate unit without undergoing any process resulting in excisable goods. The Revenue failed to establish that the inputs were processed into excisable goods before transfer. Consequently, the loading of notional profit under Rule 6(b) was unwarranted. The impugned order directing such loading was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.
The CESTAT held that Rule 6(b)(ii) of the Valuation Rules does not apply to imported raw materials used as inputs that were not manufactured by either unit and merely routed through an intermediate unit without undergoing any process resulting in excisable goods. The Revenue failed to establish that the inputs were processed into excisable goods before transfer. Consequently, the loading of notional profit under Rule 6(b) was unwarranted. The impugned order directing such loading was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.