Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The HC condoned a one-day delay in filing an appeal against an ex parte assessment order, which was originally due on a Sunday, a public holiday. The petitioner filed the appeal the following day, exceeding the prescribed period by one day. The respondent rejected the appeal for being time-barred. The HC found the reason for the delay genuine and held that the delay warranted condonation. Consequently, the rejection order was set aside, and the delay was formally condoned, allowing the appeal to proceed. The petition was disposed accordingly.
The HC condoned a one-day delay in filing an appeal against an ex parte assessment order, which was originally due on a Sunday, a public holiday. The petitioner filed the appeal the following day, exceeding the prescribed period by one day. The respondent rejected the appeal for being time-barred. The HC found the reason for the delay genuine and held that the delay warranted condonation. Consequently, the rejection order was set aside, and the delay was formally condoned, allowing the appeal to proceed. The petition was disposed accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.