Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT held that reimbursement of salary expenses for seconded employees deployed in India does not constitute fees for technical services under Article 12 of the India-US DTAA. The seconded personnel are employees of the Indian entity, whose salaries have already been taxed in India, precluding double taxation of the same amount in the hands of the assessee. The tribunal relied on prior coordinate bench decisions and Supreme Court precedent to affirm that the Indian entity alone is responsible for withholding tax on such salary payments. Consequently, the Assessing Officer was directed to delete the impugned addition, and the assessee's appeals were allowed.
The ITAT held that reimbursement of salary expenses for seconded employees deployed in India does not constitute fees for technical services under Article 12 of the India-US DTAA. The seconded personnel are employees of the Indian entity, whose salaries have already been taxed in India, precluding double taxation of the same amount in the hands of the assessee. The tribunal relied on prior coordinate bench decisions and Supreme Court precedent to affirm that the Indian entity alone is responsible for withholding tax on such salary payments. Consequently, the Assessing Officer was directed to delete the impugned addition, and the assessee's appeals were allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.