TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Functional comparability governs software-service benchmarking: dissimilar companies are excluded, while related-party filters, margins and working-ca...
The ITAT held that the absence of commencement of search pursuant to a warrant of authorization under section 132 at the registered office or any specified premises precludes the invocation of section 153A. Mere issuance or mention of the assessee's name on the warrant is insufficient without actual execution of the search and seizure process. Section 292B, which addresses procedural defects, cannot be employed to extend the scope of section 153A to cases where no search has been conducted. Furthermore, section 292BB pertains solely to the validity of notice service and does not confer jurisdiction where it does not otherwise exist. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision dismissing the revenue's appeal, affirming that the reassessment proceedings under section 153A were invalid in the absence of a valid search operation.
The ITAT held that the absence of commencement of search pursuant to a warrant of authorization under section 132 at the registered office or any specified premises precludes the invocation of section 153A. Mere issuance or mention of the assessee's name on the warrant is insufficient without actual execution of the search and seizure process. Section 292B, which addresses procedural defects, cannot be employed to extend the scope of section 153A to cases where no search has been conducted. Furthermore, section 292BB pertains solely to the validity of notice service and does not confer jurisdiction where it does not otherwise exist. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision dismissing the revenue's appeal, affirming that the reassessment proceedings under section 153A were invalid in the absence of a valid search operation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.