Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT held that the TPO's allocation of indirect expenses proportionate to export revenue was erroneous, as these expenses were also attributable to an abandoned project. The assessee had consistently disallowed the entire indirect expenses in income computation and allocated actual expenses to the trading activity. The tribunal found the TPO's approach flawed, resulting in an improper tinkering of the assessee's operating margin. Consequently, the ITAT directed the TPO to accept the assessee's operating margin of 6.24% for the trading activity. No transfer pricing adjustment was warranted. The grounds raised by the assessee were accordingly allowed, resolving the dispute in their favor.
The ITAT held that the TPO's allocation of indirect expenses proportionate to export revenue was erroneous, as these expenses were also attributable to an abandoned project. The assessee had consistently disallowed the entire indirect expenses in income computation and allocated actual expenses to the trading activity. The tribunal found the TPO's approach flawed, resulting in an improper tinkering of the assessee's operating margin. Consequently, the ITAT directed the TPO to accept the assessee's operating margin of 6.24% for the trading activity. No transfer pricing adjustment was warranted. The grounds raised by the assessee were accordingly allowed, resolving the dispute in their favor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.