Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT held that the issuance of the notice under section 148 dated 05.04.2022 by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) was invalid as per the CBDT Notification dated 29.03.2022, which mandates faceless assessment and automated allocation through the National Faceless Assessment Centre (NFAC) under the e-assessment scheme. The notification applies to reassessment proceedings under section 147 and requires that notices be issued only by the NFAC in accordance with the risk management strategy, thereby excluding the JAO from issuing such notices post-notification. Consequently, the impugned notice and subsequent order under section 148A(d) were quashed. The ITAT relied on High Court precedents favoring the assessee, affirming that post-notification, the JAO lacks jurisdiction to initiate reassessment proceedings in a faceless assessment regime.
The ITAT held that the issuance of the notice under section 148 dated 05.04.2022 by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) was invalid as per the CBDT Notification dated 29.03.2022, which mandates faceless assessment and automated allocation through the National Faceless Assessment Centre (NFAC) under the e-assessment scheme. The notification applies to reassessment proceedings under section 147 and requires that notices be issued only by the NFAC in accordance with the risk management strategy, thereby excluding the JAO from issuing such notices post-notification. Consequently, the impugned notice and subsequent order under section 148A(d) were quashed. The ITAT relied on High Court precedents favoring the assessee, affirming that post-notification, the JAO lacks jurisdiction to initiate reassessment proceedings in a faceless assessment regime.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.