Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1161 to 1180 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC addressed the petitioner's erroneous claim of input tax credit (ITC) filed after the due date in GSTR-3B returns for FY 2018-19, which was disallowed in the original order. The petitioner's rectification application, submitted on 14.02.2025 to the Superintendent, Central GST & Excise, remains pending. The court refrained from adjudicating the merits, directing the adjudicating authority to reconsider the ITC claim in light of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024, relevant notifications, and circulars, subject to statutory conditions. The authority was ordered to dispose of the rectification application within three weeks of receiving a copy of the order, ensuring the petitioner is granted a personal hearing. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
The HC addressed the petitioner's erroneous claim of input tax credit (ITC) filed after the due date in GSTR-3B returns for FY 2018-19, which was disallowed in the original order. The petitioner's rectification application, submitted on 14.02.2025 to the Superintendent, Central GST & Excise, remains pending. The court refrained from adjudicating the merits, directing the adjudicating authority to reconsider the ITC claim in light of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024, relevant notifications, and circulars, subject to statutory conditions. The authority was ordered to dispose of the rectification application within three weeks of receiving a copy of the order, ensuring the petitioner is granted a personal hearing. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.