Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC addressed the petitioner's erroneous claim of input tax credit (ITC) filed after the due date in GSTR-3B returns for FY 2018-19, which was disallowed in the original order. The petitioner's rectification application, submitted on 14.02.2025 to the Superintendent, Central GST & Excise, remains pending. The court refrained from adjudicating the merits, directing the adjudicating authority to reconsider the ITC claim in light of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024, relevant notifications, and circulars, subject to statutory conditions. The authority was ordered to dispose of the rectification application within three weeks of receiving a copy of the order, ensuring the petitioner is granted a personal hearing. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
The HC addressed the petitioner's erroneous claim of input tax credit (ITC) filed after the due date in GSTR-3B returns for FY 2018-19, which was disallowed in the original order. The petitioner's rectification application, submitted on 14.02.2025 to the Superintendent, Central GST & Excise, remains pending. The court refrained from adjudicating the merits, directing the adjudicating authority to reconsider the ITC claim in light of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024, relevant notifications, and circulars, subject to statutory conditions. The authority was ordered to dispose of the rectification application within three weeks of receiving a copy of the order, ensuring the petitioner is granted a personal hearing. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
