Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT set aside the Transfer Pricing Officer's addition of notional interest on loans advanced to the assessee's associated enterprises (AEs), noting that the assessee did not charge interest on receivables from non-AEs, thereby negating any basis for adjustment on AE transactions. The tribunal held that neither the TPO nor the CIT(A) was justified in sustaining the addition of notional interest on outstanding AE receivables. Consequently, the appeal concerning interest adjustments for all three assessment years was allowed. Regarding the notional commission on corporate guarantees, the ITAT directed the Assessing Officer to apply a 1% commission rate, consistent with the tribunal's prior ruling in the assessee's own case. This order effectively reduces the transfer pricing additions and limits the corporate guarantee commission to a prescribed rate.
The ITAT set aside the Transfer Pricing Officer's addition of notional interest on loans advanced to the assessee's associated enterprises (AEs), noting that the assessee did not charge interest on receivables from non-AEs, thereby negating any basis for adjustment on AE transactions. The tribunal held that neither the TPO nor the CIT(A) was justified in sustaining the addition of notional interest on outstanding AE receivables. Consequently, the appeal concerning interest adjustments for all three assessment years was allowed. Regarding the notional commission on corporate guarantees, the ITAT directed the Assessing Officer to apply a 1% commission rate, consistent with the tribunal's prior ruling in the assessee's own case. This order effectively reduces the transfer pricing additions and limits the corporate guarantee commission to a prescribed rate.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.