TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Functional comparability governs software-service benchmarking: dissimilar companies are excluded, while related-party filters, margins and working-ca...
The ITAT upheld the AO and CIT(A)'s determination that the professional fees paid for setting up the R&D unit were capital in nature and not eligible for weighted deduction under section 35(2AB) or deduction under section 37(1). However, the Tribunal directed the AO to treat the INR 14,00,000 expenditure as part of the building's cost and allow depreciation accordingly. Regarding the weighted deduction claim under section 35(2AB) for travel expenses related to a visit to Italy, the Tribunal found no supporting evidence beyond expense details and upheld the disallowance confirmed by the CIT(A). Consequently, the appeal was partly allowed, permitting depreciation on the capitalized amount but rejecting the weighted deduction claims for travel expenses.
The ITAT upheld the AO and CIT(A)'s determination that the professional fees paid for setting up the R&D unit were capital in nature and not eligible for weighted deduction under section 35(2AB) or deduction under section 37(1). However, the Tribunal directed the AO to treat the INR 14,00,000 expenditure as part of the building's cost and allow depreciation accordingly. Regarding the weighted deduction claim under section 35(2AB) for travel expenses related to a visit to Italy, the Tribunal found no supporting evidence beyond expense details and upheld the disallowance confirmed by the CIT(A). Consequently, the appeal was partly allowed, permitting depreciation on the capitalized amount but rejecting the weighted deduction claims for travel expenses.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
