Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The CESTAT held that service tax demand on works contract services rendered to educational institutions up to 01-07-2012 is unsustainable, as the Revenue failed to prove these constructions were primarily for commerce or industry. The exemption under Mega Exemption Notification 25/2012-ST did not apply beyond 01-04-2015 and was limited to services provided to government entities. For the period post 01-07-2012, the redefined "works contract" service is taxable regardless of the purpose of construction, thus the demand for this period is upheld, subject to limitation findings. The demand on works contract services rendered as a sub-contractor is also sustained. The extended period for demand is not invokable due to absence of willful suppression or fraud, limiting recoveries to the normal limitation period. Penalties under Sections 77(2) and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 are set aside. The appeal is allowed in part.
The CESTAT held that service tax demand on works contract services rendered to educational institutions up to 01-07-2012 is unsustainable, as the Revenue failed to prove these constructions were primarily for commerce or industry. The exemption under Mega Exemption Notification 25/2012-ST did not apply beyond 01-04-2015 and was limited to services provided to government entities. For the period post 01-07-2012, the redefined "works contract" service is taxable regardless of the purpose of construction, thus the demand for this period is upheld, subject to limitation findings. The demand on works contract services rendered as a sub-contractor is also sustained. The extended period for demand is not invokable due to absence of willful suppression or fraud, limiting recoveries to the normal limitation period. Penalties under Sections 77(2) and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 are set aside. The appeal is allowed in part.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.