Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The appellant reversed CENVAT credit under Rule 3(5B) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, upon writing off the value of capital goods in their books. The demand for interest and penalty for the period prior to 01.03.2013 was held unsustainable, as the recovery provision was introduced only from that date and cannot be applied retrospectively. For the period after 01.03.2013, interest was not payable since the appellant had adequate CENVAT credit balance to meet the reversal liability, and interest is only due when credit is wrongly availed and utilized. Consequently, the penalty imposed for non-payment of interest was also set aside. The appellate authority set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant is not liable for interest or penalty on the reversal of CENVAT credit under Rule 3(5B).
The appellant reversed CENVAT credit under Rule 3(5B) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, upon writing off the value of capital goods in their books. The demand for interest and penalty for the period prior to 01.03.2013 was held unsustainable, as the recovery provision was introduced only from that date and cannot be applied retrospectively. For the period after 01.03.2013, interest was not payable since the appellant had adequate CENVAT credit balance to meet the reversal liability, and interest is only due when credit is wrongly availed and utilized. Consequently, the penalty imposed for non-payment of interest was also set aside. The appellate authority set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant is not liable for interest or penalty on the reversal of CENVAT credit under Rule 3(5B).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
