Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC held that reopening notices issued under section 148 between 01.04.2021 and 30.06.2021, treated as deemed notices under section 148A(b), followed by show-cause notices and orders under section 148A(d), and subsequent reassessment notices issued post-July 2022, were subject to the limitation regime under the amended provisions. Applying the Supreme Court's ruling in Rajeev Bansal, the court found that the impugned reassessment notices were issued beyond the prescribed limitation period. Consequently, all such notices were declared time-barred and quashed. The assessee's appeal was allowed, thereby invalidating the reopening of assessments under section 147 due to non-compliance with the statutory limitation framework as amended and extended during the COVID-19 period.
The HC held that reopening notices issued under section 148 between 01.04.2021 and 30.06.2021, treated as deemed notices under section 148A(b), followed by show-cause notices and orders under section 148A(d), and subsequent reassessment notices issued post-July 2022, were subject to the limitation regime under the amended provisions. Applying the Supreme Court's ruling in Rajeev Bansal, the court found that the impugned reassessment notices were issued beyond the prescribed limitation period. Consequently, all such notices were declared time-barred and quashed. The assessee's appeal was allowed, thereby invalidating the reopening of assessments under section 147 due to non-compliance with the statutory limitation framework as amended and extended during the COVID-19 period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.