Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT held that the reopening of assessment under section 147 was procedurally flawed as the notice under section 148A(b) did not indicate escapement of income, rendering the addition under section 68 on Rs.17 lakhs received from a shell company unsustainable. The Tribunal dismissed the reopening and addition on this ground. Regarding the addition on account of sale of investments, the assessee had furnished adequate evidence which the AO and CIT(A) failed to consider; thus, the addition was deleted, and the matter remanded for reassessment. Concerning disallowance of salaries paid to 34 employees, the Tribunal found no defect or justification for disallowance, emphasizing that the tax authorities cannot question the business decision regarding employee strength or salary payments, and upheld the salaries as allowable expenditure.
The ITAT held that the reopening of assessment under section 147 was procedurally flawed as the notice under section 148A(b) did not indicate escapement of income, rendering the addition under section 68 on Rs.17 lakhs received from a shell company unsustainable. The Tribunal dismissed the reopening and addition on this ground. Regarding the addition on account of sale of investments, the assessee had furnished adequate evidence which the AO and CIT(A) failed to consider; thus, the addition was deleted, and the matter remanded for reassessment. Concerning disallowance of salaries paid to 34 employees, the Tribunal found no defect or justification for disallowance, emphasizing that the tax authorities cannot question the business decision regarding employee strength or salary payments, and upheld the salaries as allowable expenditure.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.