Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT set aside the addition of Rs. 1 crore made by the AO on account of unverified purchases, holding that the assessee had furnished adequate details, including purchase and sales invoices, sundry creditors exceeding Rs. 1 lakh with full particulars, and no defect was pointed out by the AO. The tribunal found the addition unjustified and ruled in favor of the assessee. Further, the addition under section 68 read with section 115BBE related to advances from customers was deleted, as the assessee rectified the erroneous classification of a loan as an advance through journal entries. Regarding the addition under section 69A for unexplained cash deposits, the tribunal accepted the assessee's explanation supported by cash books, sales registers, VAT returns, and bank records, confirming the deposits originated from cash sales and opening balances. All impugned additions were thus deleted, favoring the assessee.
The ITAT set aside the addition of Rs. 1 crore made by the AO on account of unverified purchases, holding that the assessee had furnished adequate details, including purchase and sales invoices, sundry creditors exceeding Rs. 1 lakh with full particulars, and no defect was pointed out by the AO. The tribunal found the addition unjustified and ruled in favor of the assessee. Further, the addition under section 68 read with section 115BBE related to advances from customers was deleted, as the assessee rectified the erroneous classification of a loan as an advance through journal entries. Regarding the addition under section 69A for unexplained cash deposits, the tribunal accepted the assessee's explanation supported by cash books, sales registers, VAT returns, and bank records, confirming the deposits originated from cash sales and opening balances. All impugned additions were thus deleted, favoring the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
