Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT allowed the appeal, holding that the assessee validly exercised the option for taxation under section 115BAA for AY 2020-21, as evidenced by declarations in the ITR-6 and tax audit report. The non-filing of Form No. 10-IC within the prescribed time under Rule 21AE was deemed a procedural lapse that did not vitiate substantive compliance. The assessee's omission was involuntary, given the absence of intimation under section 143(1) and the expiry of the filing window before awareness of the demand. The matter was restored to the AO for verification of factual matrix and fulfillment of all conditions under section 115BAA. The assessee was directed to file Form No. 10-IC during AO proceedings. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, affirming that procedural defects alone cannot defeat a bona fide claim where revenue is not prejudiced.
The ITAT allowed the appeal, holding that the assessee validly exercised the option for taxation under section 115BAA for AY 2020-21, as evidenced by declarations in the ITR-6 and tax audit report. The non-filing of Form No. 10-IC within the prescribed time under Rule 21AE was deemed a procedural lapse that did not vitiate substantive compliance. The assessee's omission was involuntary, given the absence of intimation under section 143(1) and the expiry of the filing window before awareness of the demand. The matter was restored to the AO for verification of factual matrix and fulfillment of all conditions under section 115BAA. The assessee was directed to file Form No. 10-IC during AO proceedings. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, affirming that procedural defects alone cannot defeat a bona fide claim where revenue is not prejudiced.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.