Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT set aside the AO's valuation of the land at Rs. 3,621 per sq.yd. and directed adoption of Rs. 15,000 per sq.yd. as the cost of acquisition as of 01.04.2001, granting indexation benefit from that date. The AO's reduction of the covered area to 2,000 sq.ft. was rejected; the Tribunal upheld the covered area at 3,302.51 sq.ft. as per the site plan and draft order. The cost of construction was fixed at Rs. 821 per sq.ft. based on the Registered Valuer's report, rejecting the DVO's lower rate. The AO was directed to recompute Long Term Capital Gain incorporating these findings: land area at 528.125 sq.yd., land cost at Rs. 15,000 per sq.yd., and construction cost at Rs. 821 per sq.ft. The assessee's appeal was allowed accordingly.
The ITAT set aside the AO's valuation of the land at Rs. 3,621 per sq.yd. and directed adoption of Rs. 15,000 per sq.yd. as the cost of acquisition as of 01.04.2001, granting indexation benefit from that date. The AO's reduction of the covered area to 2,000 sq.ft. was rejected; the Tribunal upheld the covered area at 3,302.51 sq.ft. as per the site plan and draft order. The cost of construction was fixed at Rs. 821 per sq.ft. based on the Registered Valuer's report, rejecting the DVO's lower rate. The AO was directed to recompute Long Term Capital Gain incorporating these findings: land area at 528.125 sq.yd., land cost at Rs. 15,000 per sq.yd., and construction cost at Rs. 821 per sq.ft. The assessee's appeal was allowed accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
