Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT upheld the acceptance of the internal TNMM method based on audited segmental data for transfer pricing adjustments, rejecting the Revenue's attempt to disallow the certified segmental comparison between AE and Non-AE transactions. The tribunal emphasized consistency by noting that the TPO had previously accepted the segmentation approach for the same parameters in earlier assessment years without adjustment, precluding a contrary stance in the current year. Citing precedent, the tribunal held that a factual position accepted and not challenged in prior years cannot be altered subsequently. The ITAT further found internal TNMM, supported by audited segmental accounts, to be superior to external TNMM and ruled in favor of the assessee, directing acceptance of the internal TNMM method as the most appropriate for the transfer pricing determination. The appeal was accordingly allowed.
The ITAT upheld the acceptance of the internal TNMM method based on audited segmental data for transfer pricing adjustments, rejecting the Revenue's attempt to disallow the certified segmental comparison between AE and Non-AE transactions. The tribunal emphasized consistency by noting that the TPO had previously accepted the segmentation approach for the same parameters in earlier assessment years without adjustment, precluding a contrary stance in the current year. Citing precedent, the tribunal held that a factual position accepted and not challenged in prior years cannot be altered subsequently. The ITAT further found internal TNMM, supported by audited segmental accounts, to be superior to external TNMM and ruled in favor of the assessee, directing acceptance of the internal TNMM method as the most appropriate for the transfer pricing determination. The appeal was accordingly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.