Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
The HC upheld the impugned order confirming tax liability on the deceased individual, rejecting the limitation plea under Section 74(10) of the GST Act by applying Section 9 of the General Clauses Act, 1897. The limitation period commenced from 06.02.2020, making the order dated 05.02.2025 timely. Procedural compliance was affirmed as notices were properly served and opportunities to respond were granted. No interference was warranted with the order. However, acknowledging the petitioner's potential liability under Section 93, the court granted leave to file a statutory appeal under Section 107 within 30 days of receipt of the order. The appeal was accordingly dismissed.
The HC upheld the impugned order confirming tax liability on the deceased individual, rejecting the limitation plea under Section 74(10) of the GST Act by applying Section 9 of the General Clauses Act, 1897. The limitation period commenced from 06.02.2020, making the order dated 05.02.2025 timely. Procedural compliance was affirmed as notices were properly served and opportunities to respond were granted. No interference was warranted with the order. However, acknowledging the petitioner's potential liability under Section 93, the court granted leave to file a statutory appeal under Section 107 within 30 days of receipt of the order. The appeal was accordingly dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
