Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
The HC upheld the impugned order confirming tax liability on the deceased individual, rejecting the limitation plea under Section 74(10) of the GST Act by applying Section 9 of the General Clauses Act, 1897. The limitation period commenced from 06.02.2020, making the order dated 05.02.2025 timely. Procedural compliance was affirmed as notices were properly served and opportunities to respond were granted. No interference was warranted with the order. However, acknowledging the petitioner's potential liability under Section 93, the court granted leave to file a statutory appeal under Section 107 within 30 days of receipt of the order. The appeal was accordingly dismissed.
The HC upheld the impugned order confirming tax liability on the deceased individual, rejecting the limitation plea under Section 74(10) of the GST Act by applying Section 9 of the General Clauses Act, 1897. The limitation period commenced from 06.02.2020, making the order dated 05.02.2025 timely. Procedural compliance was affirmed as notices were properly served and opportunities to respond were granted. No interference was warranted with the order. However, acknowledging the petitioner's potential liability under Section 93, the court granted leave to file a statutory appeal under Section 107 within 30 days of receipt of the order. The appeal was accordingly dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
