Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
The ITAT partially upheld the disallowance under section 40A(3), allowing cash payments of Rs. 1,10,000 and Rs. 23,655 related to legal and professional expenses for stamp paper purchase and IMFL lorry accident, respectively, as legitimate. However, other expenses supported only by ledger accounts without corresponding vouchers or bills, including travel expenses, were correctly disallowed. Regarding the adjustment of disallowance under section 14A while computing income under section 115JB for MAT purposes, the tribunal reaffirmed that no such adjustment is permissible in book profits, consistent with precedent from the jurisdictional High Court and Special Bench decisions favoring the assessee. Thus, the appeal was partly allowed in respect of the disallowed expenses and the MAT adjustment claim was rejected.
The ITAT partially upheld the disallowance under section 40A(3), allowing cash payments of Rs. 1,10,000 and Rs. 23,655 related to legal and professional expenses for stamp paper purchase and IMFL lorry accident, respectively, as legitimate. However, other expenses supported only by ledger accounts without corresponding vouchers or bills, including travel expenses, were correctly disallowed. Regarding the adjustment of disallowance under section 14A while computing income under section 115JB for MAT purposes, the tribunal reaffirmed that no such adjustment is permissible in book profits, consistent with precedent from the jurisdictional High Court and Special Bench decisions favoring the assessee. Thus, the appeal was partly allowed in respect of the disallowed expenses and the MAT adjustment claim was rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
