Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT reversed the lower authorities' disallowance of the assessee's claim for exemption under section 11 in respect of accumulated income from AY 2017-18 onwards. The Tribunal held that the statutory amendment to section 11(3)(c), effective from AY 2023-24, could not retrospectively apply to prior accumulations. The prescribed application period for accumulated funds remained unaltered for years preceding the amendment. Consequently, the Revenue's rejection of the exemption claim was found to lack merit. Relying on precedents emphasizing non-retroactivity and strict interpretation, the Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal, restoring the exemption for income accumulated before the amended provision's operative year.
The ITAT reversed the lower authorities' disallowance of the assessee's claim for exemption under section 11 in respect of accumulated income from AY 2017-18 onwards. The Tribunal held that the statutory amendment to section 11(3)(c), effective from AY 2023-24, could not retrospectively apply to prior accumulations. The prescribed application period for accumulated funds remained unaltered for years preceding the amendment. Consequently, the Revenue's rejection of the exemption claim was found to lack merit. Relying on precedents emphasizing non-retroactivity and strict interpretation, the Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal, restoring the exemption for income accumulated before the amended provision's operative year.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.