Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held that the impugned demand for tax and penalty issued on 11th September, 2024, was beyond the statutory period prescribed under Section 129 of the Odisha GST Act, 2017, as the notice was dated 31st August, 2024. Consequently, the demand was invalid due to non-compliance with the prescribed timeline for issuance following vehicle detention. The court set aside and quashed the impugned demand, allowing the writ petition and disposing of the matter accordingly.
The HC held that the impugned demand for tax and penalty issued on 11th September, 2024, was beyond the statutory period prescribed under Section 129 of the Odisha GST Act, 2017, as the notice was dated 31st August, 2024. Consequently, the demand was invalid due to non-compliance with the prescribed timeline for issuance following vehicle detention. The court set aside and quashed the impugned demand, allowing the writ petition and disposing of the matter accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
