Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The HC set aside the cancellation of registration of petitioner no. 1 under the WBGST/CGST Act, 2017, which had been initially revoked on grounds of fraud, willful misstatement, and suppression of facts regarding the existence of the business entity at the notified address. Following a directed inquiry and physical verification pursuant to Rule 25 of the WBGST/CGST Rules, 2017, the Court found the business premises to be legitimately operational at the specified location. Consequently, the Court held that the cancellation order dated 17th February 2023 and all consequential orders were unsustainable and quashed them. The petition was accordingly disposed of.
The HC set aside the cancellation of registration of petitioner no. 1 under the WBGST/CGST Act, 2017, which had been initially revoked on grounds of fraud, willful misstatement, and suppression of facts regarding the existence of the business entity at the notified address. Following a directed inquiry and physical verification pursuant to Rule 25 of the WBGST/CGST Rules, 2017, the Court found the business premises to be legitimately operational at the specified location. Consequently, the Court held that the cancellation order dated 17th February 2023 and all consequential orders were unsustainable and quashed them. The petition was accordingly disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
