Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The HC examined the validity of recovery proceedings in light of the non-constitution of the GST Appellate Tribunal and compliance with Section 107(6) of the CGST Act, alongside the applicability of Circular No. 224/18/2024 GST dated 11th July, 2024. The petitioner had availed benefits under the said circular and deposited 10% of the demanded amount. The court held that since the petitioner complied with the prescribed guidelines by making the requisite deposit, the recovery notices issued on 28th February, 19th March, and 25th March 2025 were quashed. The petition was accordingly disposed of.
The HC examined the validity of recovery proceedings in light of the non-constitution of the GST Appellate Tribunal and compliance with Section 107(6) of the CGST Act, alongside the applicability of Circular No. 224/18/2024 GST dated 11th July, 2024. The petitioner had availed benefits under the said circular and deposited 10% of the demanded amount. The court held that since the petitioner complied with the prescribed guidelines by making the requisite deposit, the recovery notices issued on 28th February, 19th March, and 25th March 2025 were quashed. The petition was accordingly disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
