Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
The ITAT upheld the disallowance of deduction under Section 80IB(10) for the relevant assessment year, rejecting the assessee's contention that the allowability determined for a prior year should apply by res judicata. The Tribunal affirmed that principles of res judicata do not apply across different assessment years, as each year is a separate unit of assessment subject to independent scrutiny. The assessee's claim based on a purported timely completion certificate was found to be incorrect, and since the certificate was issued beyond the prescribed completion period, the deduction was rightly denied. The decision of the CIT(Appeals) was confirmed, and the appeal was dismissed.
The ITAT upheld the disallowance of deduction under Section 80IB(10) for the relevant assessment year, rejecting the assessee's contention that the allowability determined for a prior year should apply by res judicata. The Tribunal affirmed that principles of res judicata do not apply across different assessment years, as each year is a separate unit of assessment subject to independent scrutiny. The assessee's claim based on a purported timely completion certificate was found to be incorrect, and since the certificate was issued beyond the prescribed completion period, the deduction was rightly denied. The decision of the CIT(Appeals) was confirmed, and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
