Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The CESTAT allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order insofar as it enhanced the declared transaction value and applied a higher customs duty at 15% on the lumps component of iron ore exported without segregation. The Tribunal held that the transaction value declared in the Bill of Entry, based on the sale agreement with foreign buyers, cannot be discarded without substantial proof of higher prices for identical or similar goods contemporaneously. The Department failed to demonstrate that the appellant received any consideration exceeding the invoice value or that the parties were related. The Tribunal also rejected the application of contemporaneous FOB values due to lack of statutory compliance and evidence. Additionally, iron ore lumps present in the bulk export were to be treated as part of the fines, consistent with prior rulings, and the contractual tolerance for lumps up to 10% was upheld. Consequently, duty liability was confined to the value realized, and the appeal was allowed.
The CESTAT allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order insofar as it enhanced the declared transaction value and applied a higher customs duty at 15% on the lumps component of iron ore exported without segregation. The Tribunal held that the transaction value declared in the Bill of Entry, based on the sale agreement with foreign buyers, cannot be discarded without substantial proof of higher prices for identical or similar goods contemporaneously. The Department failed to demonstrate that the appellant received any consideration exceeding the invoice value or that the parties were related. The Tribunal also rejected the application of contemporaneous FOB values due to lack of statutory compliance and evidence. Additionally, iron ore lumps present in the bulk export were to be treated as part of the fines, consistent with prior rulings, and the contractual tolerance for lumps up to 10% was upheld. Consequently, duty liability was confined to the value realized, and the appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.