Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The NCLAT upheld the NCLT's order dismissing the appellant's claim for refund of margin money deposited to secure bank guarantees during liquidation. The tribunal found that the bank guarantees had been invoked prior to the interlocutory application, rendering the application infructuous. The margin money, being a security deposit to the bank, does not constitute an asset of the corporate debtor once the guarantee is invoked. Upon invocation, the margin money is applied towards the guaranteed amount payable to the beneficiary, and no part thereof reverts to the corporate debtor. Consequently, the liquidator is not entitled to treat the margin money as corporate debtor's asset for preservation. The appeal was dismissed, confirming that the invoked bank guarantees and associated margin money are not refundable to the corporate debtor or its liquidator.
The NCLAT upheld the NCLT's order dismissing the appellant's claim for refund of margin money deposited to secure bank guarantees during liquidation. The tribunal found that the bank guarantees had been invoked prior to the interlocutory application, rendering the application infructuous. The margin money, being a security deposit to the bank, does not constitute an asset of the corporate debtor once the guarantee is invoked. Upon invocation, the margin money is applied towards the guaranteed amount payable to the beneficiary, and no part thereof reverts to the corporate debtor. Consequently, the liquidator is not entitled to treat the margin money as corporate debtor's asset for preservation. The appeal was dismissed, confirming that the invoked bank guarantees and associated margin money are not refundable to the corporate debtor or its liquidator.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.