Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The NCLAT affirmed that the guarantor's liability arose upon classification of the loan account as an NPA on 31.10.2015, with limitation commencing from the issuance of the Debt Recovery Certificate (DRC) dated 09.07.2019. Applying the Apex Court's exclusion of the COVID-19 period (15.03.2020 to 28.02.2022), the proceedings initiated on 05.07.2023 fall within the prescribed limitation. The DRC conferred fresh cause of action, establishing the certificate holder as Financial Creditor under Section 5(7) of the IBC, 2016. Notices issued under Rule 7 and Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act were valid and continuous, negating any limitation or procedural defect claims. The Tribunal's findings on limitation and notice issuance were upheld as free from error. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, confirming the validity of initiation and continuation of insolvency proceedings within the statutory timeframe.
The NCLAT affirmed that the guarantor's liability arose upon classification of the loan account as an NPA on 31.10.2015, with limitation commencing from the issuance of the Debt Recovery Certificate (DRC) dated 09.07.2019. Applying the Apex Court's exclusion of the COVID-19 period (15.03.2020 to 28.02.2022), the proceedings initiated on 05.07.2023 fall within the prescribed limitation. The DRC conferred fresh cause of action, establishing the certificate holder as Financial Creditor under Section 5(7) of the IBC, 2016. Notices issued under Rule 7 and Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act were valid and continuous, negating any limitation or procedural defect claims. The Tribunal's findings on limitation and notice issuance were upheld as free from error. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, confirming the validity of initiation and continuation of insolvency proceedings within the statutory timeframe.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
