Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT held that profits arising from the slump sale of an SEZ unit, including land classified as a long-term capital asset, qualify for deduction under Section 54EC, subject to the capital gain arising from transfer of land or building. The Tribunal rejected the Pr. CIT's view that the entire business undertaking should be treated as a single asset, thereby disallowing the deduction. Since the slump sale included land with a book value reflected in Form 3CA, the assessee was entitled to claim the Section 54EC deduction to the extent of the capital gains attributable to the land. The Tribunal found no error in the Assessing Officer's allowance of Rs. 50 lakhs as deduction under Section 54EC and set aside the Pr. CIT's order that had disallowed the claim. The AO's order was restored and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
The ITAT held that profits arising from the slump sale of an SEZ unit, including land classified as a long-term capital asset, qualify for deduction under Section 54EC, subject to the capital gain arising from transfer of land or building. The Tribunal rejected the Pr. CIT's view that the entire business undertaking should be treated as a single asset, thereby disallowing the deduction. Since the slump sale included land with a book value reflected in Form 3CA, the assessee was entitled to claim the Section 54EC deduction to the extent of the capital gains attributable to the land. The Tribunal found no error in the Assessing Officer's allowance of Rs. 50 lakhs as deduction under Section 54EC and set aside the Pr. CIT's order that had disallowed the claim. The AO's order was restored and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.