Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC upheld the Tribunal's enhancement of the addition for unaccounted on-money received by the appellant-assessee, as discovered during a search under section 132(1). The Tribunal's estimate of 10% on total booking receipts was based on the voluntary statement of the Director and corroborated by the actual cash found. The Tribunal's order merely adjusted the quantum of on-money previously sustained in part by the CIT (Appeals), applying the 10% rate across all projects, including the 'Sarjan' flats. The concurrent findings of fact by the CIT (Appeals) and the Tribunal regarding the receipt of on-money were affirmed, and no substantial question of law arose. The decision was rendered in favor of the revenue, confirming the validity of the enhanced addition on the basis of accepted factual findings.
The HC upheld the Tribunal's enhancement of the addition for unaccounted on-money received by the appellant-assessee, as discovered during a search under section 132(1). The Tribunal's estimate of 10% on total booking receipts was based on the voluntary statement of the Director and corroborated by the actual cash found. The Tribunal's order merely adjusted the quantum of on-money previously sustained in part by the CIT (Appeals), applying the 10% rate across all projects, including the 'Sarjan' flats. The concurrent findings of fact by the CIT (Appeals) and the Tribunal regarding the receipt of on-money were affirmed, and no substantial question of law arose. The decision was rendered in favor of the revenue, confirming the validity of the enhanced addition on the basis of accepted factual findings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
