Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
The HC upheld the Tribunal's enhancement of the addition for unaccounted on-money received by the appellant-assessee, as discovered during a search under section 132(1). The Tribunal's estimate of 10% on total booking receipts was based on the voluntary statement of the Director and corroborated by the actual cash found. The Tribunal's order merely adjusted the quantum of on-money previously sustained in part by the CIT (Appeals), applying the 10% rate across all projects, including the 'Sarjan' flats. The concurrent findings of fact by the CIT (Appeals) and the Tribunal regarding the receipt of on-money were affirmed, and no substantial question of law arose. The decision was rendered in favor of the revenue, confirming the validity of the enhanced addition on the basis of accepted factual findings.
The HC upheld the Tribunal's enhancement of the addition for unaccounted on-money received by the appellant-assessee, as discovered during a search under section 132(1). The Tribunal's estimate of 10% on total booking receipts was based on the voluntary statement of the Director and corroborated by the actual cash found. The Tribunal's order merely adjusted the quantum of on-money previously sustained in part by the CIT (Appeals), applying the 10% rate across all projects, including the 'Sarjan' flats. The concurrent findings of fact by the CIT (Appeals) and the Tribunal regarding the receipt of on-money were affirmed, and no substantial question of law arose. The decision was rendered in favor of the revenue, confirming the validity of the enhanced addition on the basis of accepted factual findings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.