Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT upheld the rectification order under section 154, revising the assessee's total income to INR 53,16,66,580 from the originally declared INR 52,04,08,740, directing the AO to replace the income figure of INR 58,29,98,519 used in the final assessment with the rectified amount. The tribunal allowed the appeal on this ground. Regarding the addition under section 43B for leave encashment, the ITAT observed that although the CPC disallowed INR 94,88,237, the Tax Audit Report showed payment of INR 48,77,017 made before the due date for filing the return. The AO was directed to verify these payments and allow the claim as per the provisions of section 43B. The order mandates conformity to the rectified income and proper allowance of payments made within the statutory timeline.
The ITAT upheld the rectification order under section 154, revising the assessee's total income to INR 53,16,66,580 from the originally declared INR 52,04,08,740, directing the AO to replace the income figure of INR 58,29,98,519 used in the final assessment with the rectified amount. The tribunal allowed the appeal on this ground. Regarding the addition under section 43B for leave encashment, the ITAT observed that although the CPC disallowed INR 94,88,237, the Tax Audit Report showed payment of INR 48,77,017 made before the due date for filing the return. The AO was directed to verify these payments and allow the claim as per the provisions of section 43B. The order mandates conformity to the rectified income and proper allowance of payments made within the statutory timeline.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
