Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
The HC held that the recovery of CGST from the petitioners' account prior to the expiration of the appeal filing period was erroneous. The Assistant Commissioner acknowledged the recovery was made by mistake. Consequently, the respondent is directed to rectify the error by refunding or reversing the erroneously recovered amount to the petitioners' account, along with applicable interest under the statute. This remedial action must be completed by 26.07.2025. The petition is accordingly disposed of.
The HC held that the recovery of CGST from the petitioners' account prior to the expiration of the appeal filing period was erroneous. The Assistant Commissioner acknowledged the recovery was made by mistake. Consequently, the respondent is directed to rectify the error by refunding or reversing the erroneously recovered amount to the petitioners' account, along with applicable interest under the statute. This remedial action must be completed by 26.07.2025. The petition is accordingly disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
