Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The HC set aside both the adjudicating authority's order dated 27.07.2023 and the appellate authority's order dated 21.05.2024, finding a violation of natural justice due to failure to consider the petitioner's reply and supporting circulars. The adjudicating authority did not provide reasoned or speaking orders, neglecting to analyze the applicability of the petitioner's submissions and statutory provisions under the Central/Bihar GST Act, 2017, and the EPCG Scheme. The appellate authority's partial favorable observations were insufficient to cure the procedural lapses. Consequently, the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision, mandating thorough consideration of all contentions and documents in accordance with statutory requirements and the Government of India's export promotion policy. The petition was allowed by way of remand.
The HC set aside both the adjudicating authority's order dated 27.07.2023 and the appellate authority's order dated 21.05.2024, finding a violation of natural justice due to failure to consider the petitioner's reply and supporting circulars. The adjudicating authority did not provide reasoned or speaking orders, neglecting to analyze the applicability of the petitioner's submissions and statutory provisions under the Central/Bihar GST Act, 2017, and the EPCG Scheme. The appellate authority's partial favorable observations were insufficient to cure the procedural lapses. Consequently, the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision, mandating thorough consideration of all contentions and documents in accordance with statutory requirements and the Government of India's export promotion policy. The petition was allowed by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
