Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
The HC set aside both the adjudicating authority's order dated 27.07.2023 and the appellate authority's order dated 21.05.2024, finding a violation of natural justice due to failure to consider the petitioner's reply and supporting circulars. The adjudicating authority did not provide reasoned or speaking orders, neglecting to analyze the applicability of the petitioner's submissions and statutory provisions under the Central/Bihar GST Act, 2017, and the EPCG Scheme. The appellate authority's partial favorable observations were insufficient to cure the procedural lapses. Consequently, the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision, mandating thorough consideration of all contentions and documents in accordance with statutory requirements and the Government of India's export promotion policy. The petition was allowed by way of remand.
The HC set aside both the adjudicating authority's order dated 27.07.2023 and the appellate authority's order dated 21.05.2024, finding a violation of natural justice due to failure to consider the petitioner's reply and supporting circulars. The adjudicating authority did not provide reasoned or speaking orders, neglecting to analyze the applicability of the petitioner's submissions and statutory provisions under the Central/Bihar GST Act, 2017, and the EPCG Scheme. The appellate authority's partial favorable observations were insufficient to cure the procedural lapses. Consequently, the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision, mandating thorough consideration of all contentions and documents in accordance with statutory requirements and the Government of India's export promotion policy. The petition was allowed by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
