Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC set aside the assessment order passed under Sections 147, 144 read with Section 144B, by the National Faceless Assessment Unit for AY 2018-19, finding a violation of natural justice as the petitioner was not afforded an opportunity to produce evidence or substantiate that the tax liability had been discharged in AY 2019-20. The Court held that the same income cannot be subjected to double taxation and directed the AO to allow the petitioner to submit relevant documents and reconsider the liability afresh. Despite the existence of an alternative remedy through appeal, the writ petition was entertained due to the factual matrix and potential for double assessment. The matter was remitted for fresh adjudication, with the petitioner directed to appear before the AO within two weeks to present evidence and make submissions.
The HC set aside the assessment order passed under Sections 147, 144 read with Section 144B, by the National Faceless Assessment Unit for AY 2018-19, finding a violation of natural justice as the petitioner was not afforded an opportunity to produce evidence or substantiate that the tax liability had been discharged in AY 2019-20. The Court held that the same income cannot be subjected to double taxation and directed the AO to allow the petitioner to submit relevant documents and reconsider the liability afresh. Despite the existence of an alternative remedy through appeal, the writ petition was entertained due to the factual matrix and potential for double assessment. The matter was remitted for fresh adjudication, with the petitioner directed to appear before the AO within two weeks to present evidence and make submissions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.