Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC held that the detention of approximately 200 grams of gold ornaments without issuance of a show cause notice or opportunity for personal hearing violated principles of natural justice. The jewellery qualified as 'personal effects' under the Baggage Rules, having been received as a gift and worn by the petitioner upon arrival. The Department's failure to issue a show cause notice within the statutory period under Section 110, despite the lapse of one year, rendered the detention unlawful. The court affirmed the appellate order releasing the goods upon payment of a fine and directed that the petitioner may collect the jewellery through an authorised representative upon providing written consent. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
The HC held that the detention of approximately 200 grams of gold ornaments without issuance of a show cause notice or opportunity for personal hearing violated principles of natural justice. The jewellery qualified as 'personal effects' under the Baggage Rules, having been received as a gift and worn by the petitioner upon arrival. The Department's failure to issue a show cause notice within the statutory period under Section 110, despite the lapse of one year, rendered the detention unlawful. The court affirmed the appellate order releasing the goods upon payment of a fine and directed that the petitioner may collect the jewellery through an authorised representative upon providing written consent. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
