Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The CESTAT allowed the appeal against the rejection of refund claims relating to service tax credit utilized for authorized operations within the SEZ. The tribunal held that the refund could not be denied solely on the ground that the services were consumed within the SEZ. It was established that the services claimed were covered under Notification No. 09/2009 and were not excluded by the subsequent amendment in Notification No. 15/2009. The amendment clarified that only services wholly consumed within the SEZ and exempt ab initio were excluded from refund, whereas services used for authorized operations remained eligible. The absence of evidence regarding approval by the approval committee was insufficient to reject the claim. Consequently, the impugned orders denying the refund were set aside, and the refund claims were allowed.
The CESTAT allowed the appeal against the rejection of refund claims relating to service tax credit utilized for authorized operations within the SEZ. The tribunal held that the refund could not be denied solely on the ground that the services were consumed within the SEZ. It was established that the services claimed were covered under Notification No. 09/2009 and were not excluded by the subsequent amendment in Notification No. 15/2009. The amendment clarified that only services wholly consumed within the SEZ and exempt ab initio were excluded from refund, whereas services used for authorized operations remained eligible. The absence of evidence regarding approval by the approval committee was insufficient to reject the claim. Consequently, the impugned orders denying the refund were set aside, and the refund claims were allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
