Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC set aside the impugned order of the Haryana Tax Tribunal, allowing the appellant's appeal. The Court held that the pre-deposit requirement under Section 39(5) of the repealed HGST Act, 1973, remains enforceable post-repeal due to the saving clause in Section 4 of the Punjab General Clauses Act, 1898, preserving substantive rights vested at the commencement of the lis. The right of appeal in taxation matters accrues at the initiation of proceedings and is governed by the law prevailing at that time, unaffected by subsequent enactments unless expressly stated. The repeal and saving provisions of Section 61 of the HVAT Act, 2003, affirm the continuity of legal consequences under the repealed Act. Consequently, the Court ruled that interest on delayed payment must be calculated from the date of deposit, not from the date of the order, and upheld the appellant's position, reversing the Tribunal's decision.
The HC set aside the impugned order of the Haryana Tax Tribunal, allowing the appellant's appeal. The Court held that the pre-deposit requirement under Section 39(5) of the repealed HGST Act, 1973, remains enforceable post-repeal due to the saving clause in Section 4 of the Punjab General Clauses Act, 1898, preserving substantive rights vested at the commencement of the lis. The right of appeal in taxation matters accrues at the initiation of proceedings and is governed by the law prevailing at that time, unaffected by subsequent enactments unless expressly stated. The repeal and saving provisions of Section 61 of the HVAT Act, 2003, affirm the continuity of legal consequences under the repealed Act. Consequently, the Court ruled that interest on delayed payment must be calculated from the date of deposit, not from the date of the order, and upheld the appellant's position, reversing the Tribunal's decision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.