Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC set aside the impugned order of the Haryana Tax Tribunal, allowing the appellant's appeal. The Court held that the pre-deposit requirement under Section 39(5) of the repealed HGST Act, 1973, remains enforceable post-repeal due to the saving clause in Section 4 of the Punjab General Clauses Act, 1898, preserving substantive rights vested at the commencement of the lis. The right of appeal in taxation matters accrues at the initiation of proceedings and is governed by the law prevailing at that time, unaffected by subsequent enactments unless expressly stated. The repeal and saving provisions of Section 61 of the HVAT Act, 2003, affirm the continuity of legal consequences under the repealed Act. Consequently, the Court ruled that interest on delayed payment must be calculated from the date of deposit, not from the date of the order, and upheld the appellant's position, reversing the Tribunal's decision.
The HC set aside the impugned order of the Haryana Tax Tribunal, allowing the appellant's appeal. The Court held that the pre-deposit requirement under Section 39(5) of the repealed HGST Act, 1973, remains enforceable post-repeal due to the saving clause in Section 4 of the Punjab General Clauses Act, 1898, preserving substantive rights vested at the commencement of the lis. The right of appeal in taxation matters accrues at the initiation of proceedings and is governed by the law prevailing at that time, unaffected by subsequent enactments unless expressly stated. The repeal and saving provisions of Section 61 of the HVAT Act, 2003, affirm the continuity of legal consequences under the repealed Act. Consequently, the Court ruled that interest on delayed payment must be calculated from the date of deposit, not from the date of the order, and upheld the appellant's position, reversing the Tribunal's decision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.