Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1101 to 1120 of 96136 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held that issuance of separate SCNs under Sections 73 and 74 of the WBGST/CGST Act for the same period is valid, as Section 73 pertains to tax short paid without fraud, while Section 74 addresses fraud or wilful suppression. The petitioner's challenge to the SCN's vagueness was rejected, noting adequate particulars were provided per statutory requirements and the petitioner failed to appear or adequately contest. Regarding ITC claimed on B2B supplies in GSTR-3B, the Court ruled the petitioner cannot bypass the appellate remedy and invoke writ jurisdiction, as the demand in Form GST APL04 dated 27 December 2023 is final. Consequently, demands under points 1(I) and 3(M) of the SCN dated 13 May 2024 were quashed. The demand in DRC-07 dated 19 July 2024 was set aside, and the matter remanded for fresh demand issuance consistent with the Court's directions.
The HC held that issuance of separate SCNs under Sections 73 and 74 of the WBGST/CGST Act for the same period is valid, as Section 73 pertains to tax short paid without fraud, while Section 74 addresses fraud or wilful suppression. The petitioner's challenge to the SCN's vagueness was rejected, noting adequate particulars were provided per statutory requirements and the petitioner failed to appear or adequately contest. Regarding ITC claimed on B2B supplies in GSTR-3B, the Court ruled the petitioner cannot bypass the appellate remedy and invoke writ jurisdiction, as the demand in Form GST APL04 dated 27 December 2023 is final. Consequently, demands under points 1(I) and 3(M) of the SCN dated 13 May 2024 were quashed. The demand in DRC-07 dated 19 July 2024 was set aside, and the matter remanded for fresh demand issuance consistent with the Court's directions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
