Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
The HC held that issuance of separate SCNs under Sections 73 and 74 of the WBGST/CGST Act for the same period is valid, as Section 73 pertains to tax short paid without fraud, while Section 74 addresses fraud or wilful suppression. The petitioner's challenge to the SCN's vagueness was rejected, noting adequate particulars were provided per statutory requirements and the petitioner failed to appear or adequately contest. Regarding ITC claimed on B2B supplies in GSTR-3B, the Court ruled the petitioner cannot bypass the appellate remedy and invoke writ jurisdiction, as the demand in Form GST APL04 dated 27 December 2023 is final. Consequently, demands under points 1(I) and 3(M) of the SCN dated 13 May 2024 were quashed. The demand in DRC-07 dated 19 July 2024 was set aside, and the matter remanded for fresh demand issuance consistent with the Court's directions.
The HC held that issuance of separate SCNs under Sections 73 and 74 of the WBGST/CGST Act for the same period is valid, as Section 73 pertains to tax short paid without fraud, while Section 74 addresses fraud or wilful suppression. The petitioner's challenge to the SCN's vagueness was rejected, noting adequate particulars were provided per statutory requirements and the petitioner failed to appear or adequately contest. Regarding ITC claimed on B2B supplies in GSTR-3B, the Court ruled the petitioner cannot bypass the appellate remedy and invoke writ jurisdiction, as the demand in Form GST APL04 dated 27 December 2023 is final. Consequently, demands under points 1(I) and 3(M) of the SCN dated 13 May 2024 were quashed. The demand in DRC-07 dated 19 July 2024 was set aside, and the matter remanded for fresh demand issuance consistent with the Court's directions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
