Depreciation and routine compliance expenses disallowance did not prove inaccurate particulars or misreporting; penalty sustained only on foreign trav...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3461 to 3480 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC disposed of the writ petition concerning the non-constitution of the GST Tribunal and the petitioner's request for a stay on recovery proceedings pending appeal. The petitioner had already deposited 10% of the tax demand and agreed to deposit an additional 10% of the remaining amount. In light of the Government of India's circular and the petitioner's undertaking, the court held that the requirements under Section 112(8) of the CGST Act were met. Consequently, recovery of the remaining confirmed demand is stayed pursuant to Section 112(9) of the CGST Act upon the petitioner's compliance with the prescribed pre-deposit conditions. No further directions were deemed necessary, and the writ petition was disposed of accordingly.
The HC disposed of the writ petition concerning the non-constitution of the GST Tribunal and the petitioner's request for a stay on recovery proceedings pending appeal. The petitioner had already deposited 10% of the tax demand and agreed to deposit an additional 10% of the remaining amount. In light of the Government of India's circular and the petitioner's undertaking, the court held that the requirements under Section 112(8) of the CGST Act were met. Consequently, recovery of the remaining confirmed demand is stayed pursuant to Section 112(9) of the CGST Act upon the petitioner's compliance with the prescribed pre-deposit conditions. No further directions were deemed necessary, and the writ petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
